Myths About the Headcovering

I began a study on the headcovering when I was in college to find a basis that God no longer required the headcovering for today. I did not see a need for it. As I have studied the head covering in depth, I have discovered that there are many false teachings about the headcovering stated as truth. These false teachings are in many of the commentaries. They have been preached from the pulpit, and have been passed from one Christian to another to give a "clear" understanding of what they want the Bible to say, but which have no Biblical or historical basis. They have been repeated so often, that people believe them to be true and don't verify it for themselves. As a result the church is teaching, acting, and reacting on the subject of the head veil based on faulty information. In general, I have found a lack of good scholarly research on the headcovering.

The following are some of the more significant myths about the headcovering and why they are false:

Myth #1: Hair is the head covering – as in the NIV footnote

This is an example of Scripture twisting to make the Bible say what one wants it to say. The Greek cannot be translated as it is in the NIV footnote. Words were added to and subtracted from the Greek to get this interpretation. The NIV is not totally a word for word translation. There are places where the biases of the translators comes through. This is one of them. I have not been able to find any basis in history or in studying the Greek for this interpretation. It is fairly clear from history and the Greek that I Cor. 11 is saying that women should have two coverings - long hair and a veil.

Myth #2: Only prostitutes went about with their heads uncovered and Paul did not want the Christian women associated with prostitutes.

This myth has been passed along because of a lack of good scholarly historical research. Ancient Greece and the time of Corinth under the Roman Empire have been lumped together. It would be similar to someone a thousand years from now saying how we lived in 2000 by studying life in colonial America.

The ancient city of Corinth with its temple prostitute system was destroyed in 146 BC. Julius Caesar restored Corinth a hundred years later. By the time I Corinthians was written 200 years later, Corinth was a thoroughly Roman city. Life in the Roman Empire during this time was in many ways more like society today than any other time in history. Women had a lot of "freedoms" that they did not have before. They were allowed to educate themselves, speak in public, and initiate a divorce. Women used contraceptives, practiced abortion, and exercised "sexual freedom."

The book of Acts mentions "chief" women in several of the cities, and women at Paul's speech on Mars Hill. Many non-Christian women during this time did not cover their heads with a veil, although there were some who did. Elaborate hair styles also became popular during this time.

Myth #3: I Corinthians 11 was based on cultural practices

There is no command in the NT where the Church is instructed to follow the practices of non-Christians. We are not to pattern our lives after the world but after Jesus and His commands. As you can see from the description of women in the Roman Empire, the teaching in I Cor. 11 was not based on the Corinthian culture. Nor was it based on the Jewish culture, where both men and women covered their heads. Jewish men were easily recognized by their broad brimmed hats.

I Cor. 11 is a practice that is distinctly Christian. The command for women to cover their heads and men not to cover their heads is based on creation, not culture 7(v.7-10)

Myth #4: The Corinthians wore the veil because it was the "oriental" (middle east) custom.

Part of this myth has been already addressed, but it has been perpetuated in commentaries because of an ignorance of geography. Corinth is located in Greece which is part of Europe not the middle east! The church in Corinth consisted primarily of non-Jews. It was not a predominately Jewish church. (ICor. 12:2, Acts 18:6)

Myth #5: The teaching of the headcovering was written (solely) to the church at Corinth.

This myth is usually given along with speculations about what was happening in the Corinthian church and why this was written, and why it does not apply today. This myth ignores the fact that I Corinthians is Scripture - the Word of God. The book of I Corinthians was written to all Christians, not just the Corinthians (I Cor.1:2; 11:16) It is dangerous for us (spiritually) to ignore a passage of Scripture and say it does not apply to me.

Many scholars speculate on why something was written and confidently state their speculations as facts. It is part of higher criticism. Be careful about accepting a line of reasoning as true when you see words like: "it was probably", "evidently", "most likely", "obviously", etc. It usually is the speculation of man rather than truth.

Myth #6: Paul is the one who gave this command (rather than God)

This myth attacks directly at the inspiration of Scripture. This myth is often cloaked in terms like: "what Paul was saying was", "Paul was writing to address…" It makes commands in the Bible into doctrines of men. God, not Paul, is the author of I Corinthians. Paul was only the secretary, not the author of I Corinthians. The Holy Spirit told Paul what to write. Paul did not write on his own authority (1 Cor. 14:37). There is no basis historically or otherwise to say that Paul gave this command rather than God.

Myth #7: This passage is referring to public worship

I Cor. 11 definitely includes public worship, but it not say that this is the only place it is to be practiced. We are commanded in Scripture to pray without ceasing, not just pray in church. The early church practiced the use of the headcovering throughout the week, not just on Sunday.

This myth has been perpetuated through the biases of translators and commentators. The heading in the NIV, "Propriety in Worship" (and other headings in other translations), has been added by the translators and is not in the Greek. The Christian woman is to have her head covered anytime she approaches God, at home or in public worship. The man is to have his head uncovered when he prays at home or in public.

Myth #8: Submission makes a woman inferior to men

God addresses this myth in verses 11 & 12. Both men and women are necessary and of equal importance. Husbands are not to operate independently from their wives and vice versa. Each has their God-given role that is of equal importance. Men cannot exist without women - they are born from a woman. Women cannot exist without men - they are conceived by a man. As Christians, God wants us to view each other as equally important, not inferior and superior.

Myth #9: A specific covering style is the only thing that truly covers the head

This myth occurs in congregations that have over regulated the headcovering with the commands of men. Traditionally Mennonites have made a certain type(s) of covering(s) the only valid covering. In doing that a specific covering style has been made the symbol of a covered head while excluding other covered heads by calling it "protective headgear" or as "worldly". For example, many conservative Mennonite men disregard I Corinthians 11 by covering their heads most of the time with a hat. The head is not considered to be "covered" because it is not their congregation's required style of headcovering for the women, even though the hat may cover more of the head then the woman's covering. The Mennonite white cap style of covering has much more meaning to many Mennonites than only as a headcovering for praying or prophesying. Relatively small changes in shape, size, and strings identify and label a person as liberal or conservative. Some use these small differences in style to judge a person's spirituality.

Requiring a specific style of covering is often done because of a fear of what the changes will lead to in the headcovering no longer being worn. That very mentality caused the exact opposite reaction in me as a young person and in many other young people, in seeing the headcovering as a command of men, because the Mennonite white cap style is not specified in the Bible. It is not wrong for a congregation to agree for the women to all use the same style or certain styles of head covering, as long as the focus of the people is not placed primarily on the style, but on the covered head for women and the uncovered head for men.

I Cor. 11 gives us the principle of the covered head for women and the uncovered head for men. The focus of the entire passage is on the covered or uncovered head, not the covering itself. The covered head, not the covering, is the symbol of submission.

People in the Church need to feel that the focus of the Church is first on following I Cor. 11, and secondly on style. When people, especially young people, feel the focus of the Church is mainly on the style and secondarily on following I Cor. 11, they will react and throw the covering out as false teaching or as a teaching that is not required in the Bible.


It has been amazing to me in studying the headcovering how much we have been told by Christian sources that is not true. It appears that despite the high level of education today among Christians, people are relying on other people's research or opinions rather then studying things for themselves. I challenge you to study I Cor. 11 and other subjects for yourself as if you were hunting for hidden treasure (Prov. 2:4). It is amazing what you will discover. Don't ignore I Cor. 11 just because "everyone else" thinks the headcovering does not apply to today.


+  Bible Studies
+  Bible Study Resources
+  Bible Translations
+  Children
+  Church Design
+  Eternal Security
+  Family
+  Headcovering
+  Music
+  Peace
+  Predestination
+  Salvation
+  Singleness
+  Sunday School
+  Totally Rethinking Church


Email This PageEmail This Page
Print This PagePrint This Page

The Missing Key to Spiritual Maturity

In the fall of 2007, Willow Creek church released the results of their three million dollar research into the effectiveness of their church program and 30 other churches. They were shocked to find that they were not bringing people to spiritual maturity. What they thought would produce spiritual maturity was not. They believed that the more people participated in church programs the greater spiritual maturity it would produce. They found that the amount of involvement in church programs had no correlation with the depth of someone’s spiritual maturity. What makes this mistake so significant is that Willow Creek is a church that has 12,000 churches in their Willow Creek Association, and has taught thousands of pastors how to “do church” to produce church growth. To some degree, Willow Creek Church has influenced how most churches today “do church”. “And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” (Matthew 15:14)

What is the answer to helping people come to maturity in Christ? Take another look at the Great Commission. The answer is there. We have been focusing on the first part of the commission – evangelism – and have overlooked the second half thinking we know what it is saying. But look again at what Jesus says in giving us the Great Commission: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.” (Matthew 28:19) The missing key to spiritual maturity is teaching others Christ’s commands in the New Testament and teaching them to follow the commands. An excellent subject for Bible study is to take each of Christ’s commands and study them. There is a list of Christ’s commands on this website.

Discipleship, Spiritual Maturity, and Christ’s Commands

Jesus defines a disciple as one who follows His commands. A person who is spiritually mature is one who knows Christ’s teachings in the New Testament and who follows them with all his or her heart, soul, mind and strength. The following passages of Scripture over and over stress the importance of doing what Jesus says to do:

Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: 25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. 26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

Matthew 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

You Also Might Be Interested in...

How to Become a Christian
Are you a Christian? If not, here’s how to become one!

List of Commands in the New Testament
The practical application of the Bible, the real meat, for us as Christians is Christ’s Commands. Learn how to carry out the second half of the Great Commission - ’Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.’

How to Turn the Hearts of the Fathers to the Children
The key for lasting revival. Many fathers feel inadequate in knowing how to turn the hearts of their children to them. Here is the answer from the Bible.

Totally Rethinking Church Part 1: Stepping 'Out of the Box'
Millions of Christians in the last several years are totally rethinking what ’church’ is and are looking for a deeper relationship with Christ. Much of what defines what the conventional church is, how people are fed spiritually, and how money is spent by the church does not have a specific basis in Scripture.

Is Music Amoral?
There is a debate among Christians: Is music itself amoral? That question, while appropriate to ask, is actually viewing music from the wrong perspective, or more specifically from too limited a perspective. It is amazing how much of the debate centers around the opinions of people and very little is based on the Bible.

Preparing for the Future of the Church
A proposed change in the spiritual education of children and young people. How we train our children and young people has great bearing on the spiritual commitment of the next generation.

Singleness - a Peek at God's Perspective
It is interesting to look at marriage and singleness from God’s perspective. It gives us a bigger and clearer picture.

God's Commands in the New Testament
Free resources to help your house church be successful.

Home 'Sunday Schooling'
The answer for the Spiritual education of our children in the home church. In the House church we have the freedom to look at what God’s design is for the spiritual education of the children and implement that rather than feeling like we have to make our home church a small replica of the conventional Sunday school.

To read this article on the Internet, visit http://www.freehousechurchresources.com/headcoveringmyths.php
Copyright © 2003-2011 by Free House Church Resources. All Rights Reserved.
You are free to copy, redistribute, and reprint this article free of charge. If you post an article on your website, we would appreciate a link back to this website.